Sunday, February 16, 2020

The Monsanto Company Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Monsanto Company - Research Paper Example New technologies were also incorporated such as Roundup Ready Soybeans and Bollgard insect-protected cotton which offered farmers in-seed protection. The expansion continued through the years with acquisitions and which have seen the company become a world giant in seed technologies. The company won numerous awards in the year 2010 including being recognized among the ‘100 Best Companies to Work For’ by the Fortune Magazine. It has continued to develop farming solutions to weed and insect control and was named again in 2013 by CR Magazine among â€Å"100 Best Corporate Citizens. It also announced a $400 million to expand to allow more seed development as well as create more jobs. The company’s headquarter is in the United States but has locations across the world. These include plants for manufacturing, production facilities, and centers for research as well as learning centers all of which focus the farmers. Its locations are in all continents and its facilities have seeds for many almost all crops developed using the latest technology to ensure high yields. Their seeds range from vegetables, legumes, corn, sugar and many others. it growing popularity and expansion has seen the company acquire and own many companies such as Divergence, Inc., Chesterfield Village Rsearch Center, Aly Participacoes Ltda, CanaVialis S.A, Alellyx S.A, Semillas Cristiani Burkand, De Ruiter Seeds Group and many other companies. Monsanto Company expends over $2.6 million towards research every day. This is to ensure development and production of quality seeds to the benefit of farmer and the agricultural industry as a whole and for this reason it protects it seeds with patents. It also places patents so as to ensure farmer do not reuse seeds bought seeds and this goes towards ensuring their investment are paid for. Indeed without such protections there is no incentive for

Sunday, February 2, 2020

The Acts of Remembering and Memorializing Assignment

The Acts of Remembering and Memorializing - Assignment Example The rhetoric significance of the artifact becomes the critical issue that invites fresh interpretations that affect the present and the future. According to Foss (1986), Vietnam Veterans Memorial successfully appeals to the visitors because it not only violates the conventional form and expectations but exploits visitors’ personal experience and evokes memories that are unique. Foss believes that aesthetic response and rhetoric response are different. Aesthetic response is designed towards providing visitors with pleasant sensory feelings, especially the visual aspects in terms of color, shape, design etc. But the rhetoric response tends to explore hidden meaning to the shape, color, and environment. The difference between the two is important because aesthetic and rhetoric responses together give credence to the success of the artifact. They ensure that it serves its basic purpose of remembering and memorialization of past which can be interpreted creatively to connect with the present. According to Blair and Michel (2000), the Civil Rights Memorial performs civil rights tactics because the artifact is able to engage visitors and goads them to delve deeper and connect. This is interesting because the artifact is strategically located at Montgomery, Alabama which is rich in civil rights history and on the open plaza which is near to the Church where Martin Luther King served as pastor and where the voting march rights had ended in 1965. Performance plays important role in the remembering and memorializing because the public memorials need to evoke images of the past which should instigate responses from the visitors and engage them in constructive dialogues. Blair and Michel’s ideas closely relate with that of Olson, Finnegan, and Hope because they all agree that public memorials impel rhetoric responses which make people interact not only with the artifacts but also with the historical past.